Keyword summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congregants results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (12,522 of 37,536 keywords). This Congregants is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Congregants
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠67%Congregants (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos