Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congo Ebola Outbreak results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 1,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,400 of 37,536 keywords). This Congo Ebola Outbreak is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Congo Ebola Outbreak
Keyword details
Total words: 1,032
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.7% 23.7% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.6% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst