Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congestion Pricing results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 1,041 hits. Analysis detected 8,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,065 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,649 of 37,536 keywords). This Congestion Pricing is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Congestion Pricing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
75%Congestion Pricing (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,065
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 22.7%22.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.9%20.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos