Keyword summary
22%1 analyzed article/video1,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conference results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 1,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,246 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (30,924 of 37,536 keywords). This Conference is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Conference
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
18%Conference (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,246
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510017.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos