Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conde Nast results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 543 hits . Analysis detected 3,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,908 of 37,536 keywords). This Conde Nast is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Conde Nast
Keyword details
Total words: 3,364
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst