Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conchas results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 57.9% saturation with 2,469 hits. Analysis detected 13,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,263 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,970 of 37,536 keywords). This Conchas is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Conchas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠93%Conchas (selected)9%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,263
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510092.1% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 57.9%57.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 48.1%48.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 38.9%38.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 30.2%30.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.6%13.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Keyword 57.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 48.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 38.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos