Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Development Administration results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Anecdotal , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 971 hits . Analysis detected 6,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,302 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,347 of 35,626 keywords). This Community Development Administration is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Community Development Administration
Keyword details
Total words: 7,302
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst