Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video3,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Common Good results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,922 hits. Analysis detected 5,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (34,366 of 35,696 keywords). This Common Good is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Common Good
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
4%Common Good (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos