Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comedy Cellar results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 3,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,093 of 36,658 keywords). This Comedy Cellar is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Comedy Cellar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
81%Comedy Cellar (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,946
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos