Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comeback results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,930 hits . Analysis detected 8,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,444 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,230 of 37,536 keywords). This Comeback is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Comeback
Keyword details
Total words: 9,444
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst