Keyword summary
24%1 analyzed article/video1,917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Enrollment results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 2,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,751 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,890 of 37,536 keywords). This College Enrollment is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
College Enrollment
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
10%College Enrollment (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,751
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos