Keyword summary
75%4 analyzed articles/videos7,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Collective Bargaining results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 4,086 hits. Analysis detected 29,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,294 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (26,988 of 35,718 keywords). This Collective Bargaining is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Collective Bargaining
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
25%Collective Bargaining (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles29.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate