Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cold Cuts results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Bandwagon , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 730 hits . Analysis detected 2,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,230 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,660 of 37,536 keywords). This Cold Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Cold Cuts
Keyword details
Total words: 3,230
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.3% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 22.6% 22.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst