Keyword summary
52%1 analyzed article/video530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coerced Abortion results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 1,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,581 of 37,536 keywords). This Coerced Abortion is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Coerced Abortion
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
70%Coerced Abortion (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos