Keyword summary
27% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cochinita Pibil results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,167 hits . Analysis detected 3,674 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,363 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,955 of 37,536 keywords). This Cochinita Pibil is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Cochinita Pibil
Keyword details
Total words: 5,363
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 21.8% 21.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst