Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Coalition Interoperability results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Coalition Interoperability is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Coalition Interoperability
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 772
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles772 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 19.9%19.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos