Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coachella results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 2,165 hits . Analysis detected 16,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,780 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,893 of 37,321 keywords). This Coachella is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Coachella
Keyword details
Total words: 14,780
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst