Keyword summary
33%2 analyzed articles/videos497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Co2 results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 649 hits. Analysis detected 4,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,517 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,175 of 37,533 keywords). This Co2 is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Co2
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
60%Co2 (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,517
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos