Keyword summary
99%1 analyzed article/video602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Closed Primaries results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 3,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,806 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,410 of 37,536 keywords). This Closed Primaries is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Closed Primaries
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
89%Closed Primaries (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,806
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.3% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 22.4%22.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 31.7%31.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 31.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos