Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Close Encounters Of The Third Kind results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,464 hits. Analysis detected 11,685 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Close Encounters Of The Third Kind is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Close Encounters Of The Third Kind
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 13,256
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos