Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Alarmism results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,854 hits. Analysis detected 7,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,750 of 37,536 keywords). This Climate Alarmism is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Climate Alarmism
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%Climate Alarmism (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 33.9%33.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.4%13.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos