Keyword summary
82%1 analyzed article/video891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Click To Cancel results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 2,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,673 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,434 of 37,536 keywords). This Click To Cancel is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Click To Cancel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
65%Click To Cancel (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,673
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos