Keyword summary
â 17% 1 analyzed article/video 1,987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clearstream Gardens results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 403 hits . Analysis detected 2,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,961 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 20% (29,696 of 36,701 keywords). This Clearstream Gardens is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Clearstream Gardens
Keyword details
Total words: 5,961
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst