Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Clean Energy Transition results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 377 hits . Analysis detected 3,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,037 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Clean Energy Transition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Clean Energy Transition
Keyword details
Total words: 5,037
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst