Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clay Holmes results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 354 hits . Analysis detected 2,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,513 of 36,899 keywords). This Clay Holmes is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Clay Holmes
Keyword details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst