Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claudio Manuel Neves Valente results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 3,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (4,243 of 37,536 keywords). This Claudio Manuel Neves Valente is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Claudio Manuel Neves Valente
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 25.2%25.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 18.3%18.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 25.2%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos