Keyword summary
27% 2 analyzed articles/videos 830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clarksville results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 4,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,275 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,067 of 37,329 keywords). This Clarksville is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Clarksville
Keyword details
Total words: 6,275
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst