Keyword summary
52%2 analyzed articles/videos1,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilians results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 650 hits. Analysis detected 3,438 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,262 of 35,050 keywords). This Civilians is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Civilians
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
54%Civilians (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,224
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos