Keyword summary
â 20% 1 analyzed article/video 1,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Rights Museum results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 400 hits . Analysis detected 1,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of â 28% (41,330 of 56,863 keywords). This Civil Rights Museum is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Civil Rights Museum
Keyword details
Total words: 4,840
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst