Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Rights Leaders results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Pessimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 493 hits . Analysis detected 4,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,472 of 37,536 keywords). This Civil Rights Leaders is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Civil Rights Leaders
Keyword details
Total words: 3,492
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst