Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cityfheps results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 473 hits. Analysis detected 3,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,206 of 37,536 keywords). This Cityfheps is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Cityfheps
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
60%Cityfheps (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos