Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cityfheps results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 473 hits . Analysis detected 3,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,206 of 37,536 keywords). This Cityfheps is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Cityfheps
Keyword details
Total words: 3,864
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst