Keyword summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Solicitor results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,276 hits . Analysis detected 8,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (34,281 of 55,122 keywords). This City Solicitor is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. City Solicitor
Keyword details
Total words: 10,752
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst