Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Norris results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 1,816 hits . Analysis detected 4,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,572 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,521 of 37,536 keywords). This Chuck Norris is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Chuck Norris
Keyword details
Total words: 7,572
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.0% 24.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst