Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Hatfield results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 2,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,896 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,635 of 35,010 keywords). This Chuck Hatfield is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Chuck Hatfield
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
16%Chuck Hatfield (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,896
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

15% percentile
025507510015.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos