Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Hatfield results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 277 hits . Analysis detected 2,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,896 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,635 of 35,010 keywords). This Chuck Hatfield is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group. Chuck Hatfield
Keyword details
Total words: 3,896
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst