Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Christopher Saracino results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 2,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,278 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,649 keywords). This Christopher Saracino is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Christopher Saracino
Keyword details
Total words: 4,278
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst