Keyword summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Harborne results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 548 hits . Analysis detected 4,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,202 of 37,203 keywords). This Christopher Harborne is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Christopher Harborne
Keyword details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst