Keyword summary
15% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Wonsley results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 345 hits . Analysis detected 2,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,564 of 37,536 keywords). This Christine Wonsley is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Christine Wonsley
Keyword details
Total words: 3,672
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst