Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Alexandra Voros results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 986 hits. Analysis detected 3,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (30,911 of 37,536 keywords). This Christina Alexandra Voros is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Christina Alexandra Voros
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510017.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos