Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 483 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Aguilera results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 1,362 hits . Analysis detected 5,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,829 of 35,445 keywords). This Christina Aguilera is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Christina Aguilera
Keyword details
Total words: 5,156
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 26.4% 26.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst