Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christians results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 990 hits. Analysis detected 6,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,075 of 34,832 keywords). This Christians is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Christians
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
94%Christians (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510094.0% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 42.1%42.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 22.0%22.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.4%23.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 42.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Tu Quoque: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos