Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Djakisa results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 1,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (33,271 of 35,718 keywords). This Christian Djakisa is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Christian Djakisa
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
7%Christian Djakisa (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos