Keyword summary
84% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Van Hollen results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,364 hits . Analysis detected 11,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,183 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,280 of 37,288 keywords). This Chris Van Hollen is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Chris Van Hollen
Keyword details
Total words: 6,183
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst