Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Reykdal results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,035 hits . Analysis detected 5,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,561 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (17,054 of 37,536 keywords). This Chris Reykdal is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Chris Reykdal
Keyword details
Total words: 5,561
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst