Keyword summary
100%2 analyzed articles/videos636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cholesterol results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53% saturation with 1,012 hits. Analysis detected 4,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,908 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,412 of 36,033 keywords). This Cholesterol is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Cholesterol
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
91%Cholesterol (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,908
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
7.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 53.0%53.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 37.0%37.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 9.8%9.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 53.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 37.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos