Keyword summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Choir results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 563 hits . Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,039 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,005 of 37,536 keywords). This Choir is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Choir
Keyword details
Total words: 3,039
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst