Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinook Salmon results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 546 hits. Analysis detected 5,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,956 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (33,582 of 35,675 keywords). This Chinook Salmon is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Chinook Salmon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
6%Chinook Salmon (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,956
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

6% percentile
02550751005.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos