Keyword summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 1,650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Exclusion Act results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 940 hits . Analysis detected 4,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,721 of 37,536 keywords). This Chinese Exclusion Act is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Chinese Exclusion Act
Keyword details
Total words: 4,950
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.0% 19.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst