Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chinese Donors results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 449 hits . Analysis detected 3,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,187 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,992 keywords). This Chinese Donors is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chinese Donors
Keyword details
Total words: 2,187
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.5% 20.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst