Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Security Law results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 54.3% saturation with 1,215 hits . Analysis detected 4,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,370 of 37,533 keywords). This China Security Law is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. China Security Law
Keyword details
Total words: 2,236
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.0% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 54.3% 54.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 31.2% 31.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Keyword 54.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 31.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst