Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Children In Danger results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 1,867 hits . Analysis detected 5,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,191 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,023 of 35,988 keywords). This Children In Danger is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Children In Danger
Keyword details
Total words: 4,191
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.8% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 44.5% 44.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 33.2% 33.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.9% 30.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 44.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 33.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst